Reflections & analysis about innovation, technology, startups, investing, healthcare, and more .... with a focus on Minnesota, Land of 10,000 Lakes. Blogging continuously since 2005.

Tag: Forbes.com

The Year in VC: Forbes Reports It Well

As I look forward to DEMO, starting tomorrow evening — a VC lovefest like no other — I really enjoyed reading Forbes.com today.  I continue to be impressed by their coverage of tech.  It surely has something to do not only with their great reporters and editors (especially in the Silicon Valley bureau), but with their very well respected tech-savvy publisher, Rich Karlgaard, whom I count among my most admired colleagues.Forbeslogo

And the fact that he hails originally from the part of the country where I live also makes him very special, too!  Though he’s a Stanford boy and has lived in the Valley for many years, he gets back to the Minnesota/Wisconsin/Dakotas area regularly, and I suspect that’s partly because it keeps him feeling grounded to his roots.

Forbes uncorked an awesome set of stories the past couple of days on the current state of VC — well, really tech deal-making in general.  It’s all tied to their annual Midas 100 List, which ranks the top tech deal makers in the world. Forbesmidaslist08It’s fascinating reading.

According to Forbes, companies that venture capitalists helped launch hauled in $34 billion from 86 public offerings and 304 acquisitions during 2007. No less than 31 IPOs happened in the fourth quarter, worth $3 billion — "more than any other quarter since the third quarter of 2000."  That’s a very telling stat.  Their assessment of who did what, and how much they and their investors profited, can be viewed here by rank, by name, or by company.

Some of the related stories to this coverage included the following, which is great reading for anyone involved in technology startups:

Big Wins For Venture Capitalists – An excerpt: "Recent credit crunch and market woes be damned: Technology’s most powerful deal makers have been on a winning streak."

Venture Firms Peek Out Of Silicon Valley – I love this part: "More and more firms are thinking that if they want differentiated deal flow, they need to look outside of Silicon Valley," said Village Ventures co-founder Matt Harris. Village Ventures manages $750 million in funds focused on 14 small cities across the country, from Boise, Idaho, to Tucson, Arizona. This article also includes a profile of a VC from my part of the country: John Neis, co-founder of Madison, WI-based Venture Investors, who’s one of the Midas 100.

The Golden Google Touch – "Google has been a bonanza for venture capitalists John Doerr and Michael Moritz, who helped fund the Google when it was a start-up. Their personal gains, according to Forbes’ estimates, are likely north of $800 million apiece."

Hot Or Not: Where VCs Will–And Won’t–Invest – "Forbes asked 10 top players to give us their assessments of areas they feel are hot–and which are not."

All in all, a great overview of the current situation, and you’ll see even more links of interest, too.  They even have some informative videos posted that are part of this coverage, such as interviews with certain  players they cover in these articles.  I’m really impressed with the expanded coverage Forbes.com is providing on their site, and the quality of that coverage.

[I’m excited that Tech-Surf-Blog will be part of the Forbes Financial & Business Blog Network when it launches soon. (Yes, that’s part of the reason I’m starting to include ads on this site.) ]

What do you think of the current state of tech deal-making?  Are you positive or negative about 2008 when it comes to VC funding, IPOs, or M&A?

Rich Karlgaard on ‘Net Disruption and Forbes

Switching back to the event I attended this past Thursday evening, the RAIN Makers Conference, I wanted to pass along some of the insightful remarks made in the dinner keynote by my friend Richkarlgaardheadshot_2 Rich Karlgaard of Forbes. [Or as Guy Kawasaki, another friend and business partner, calls him, “Brother Rich.”]

“Since 2001, the global economy has added the equivalent of the whole U.S. economy,” Rich said, as he opened his talk with reference to macro trends. But, though the fundamentals are good, experts don’t agree that it’s a good economy, he said. And, when experts differ so much, something is up. “That something is we’re living in the greatest period of business model change — ever! Companies can come out of nowhere and knock out big players,” Karlgaard said. He referred to what McKinsey & Company calls the “topple rate” of established industry leaders, which tripled over a 20-year period according to their research. Rainmakersconf_1 One industry where this is happening is newspapers, with the stock of the New York Times, for example, at half what it was in 2002. Why is the industry in trouble? “Craig’s List is one reason,” he said, “a company with 23 employees.” He noted that McKinsey said the topple rate will triple again, and he gave some reasons why this volatility will stay with us. “The backside of Moore’s Law is the part that’s important. As performance increases, prices drop 30% a year. Suddenly, hundreds of millions more people can afford technology every year.” He also cited the example of Google bootstrapping its way early on, with the founders not taking equity investment but instead maxing out their credit cards.

Another reason is that the Internet is an amazing price arbitrage system. “Today, what two students can do on the ‘Net is more than what 10 analysts could do ten years ago. Now, anybody can determine what your margins are and come in well under your prices — maybe even 10% of them. Anyone can pick up your skirt.” Karlgaard gave an example of a 17-year-old kid he wrote about in his column recently who did such a thing and grossed $400,000 over three months, just by putting together a virtual team. He talked to his worldwide team members by phone only twice, doing everything else by email or IM. “Just another example,” Rich said, “of the Cheap Revolution at work.”

A final reason he said we’ll continue to see volatility is the amount of capital available. “Forbes even took capital recently — from Elevation Partners, where Bono is a partner!” Bono Read more about that in this Reuters story. [Another Elevation partner is Roger MacNamee, who has a rock band of his own: The Flying Other Brothers. Hey, I got the t-shirt! Right from Roger a few years ago…] Just how much money is out there? Rich laid it out: “About $1.5 trillion in risk capital is sloshing around looking to cause havoc. And about a half trillion of that is in the U.S. We’ll have volatility up the kazoo — get used to it.”

“What does all this have to do with you?” he asked the primarily Midwest audience of angels and business owners. “Well, cost becomes important.” He gave the example of companies such as Intel and HP that are lucky enough to have sales of $700,000 per employee — which may sound impressive, but it’s still not enough for these employees to really afford to live in Silicon Valley. “Now, Google, at $1.4 million in revenues per employee — they can!” His point: “The cost gap between the Valley and rural America is bigger than ever. But the knowledge gap isn’t.” Media access is not a problem anywhere, either, he pointed out — citing how it was much, much different when he grew up in Bismarck, ND. “All this portends well for a heartland revival,” Karlgaard said. “It’s a great time to be a nimble, small private company in a small or midsized town.” The macro trends favor disruption, he said. And the role of the U.S. in the global economy is “systems integrator to the world.”

How the Internet Is Affecting Forbes
Karlgaard also related some very interesting numbers about his employer, in addition to the recent equity investment by Elevation Partners. The surprising stats to many will be the growth metrics of Forbes.com. Forbescomlogo “It’s growing at 70% year-over-year, and will have more ad revenue than the magazine by the end of 2007.” He said that’s what got Elevation Partners interested. “In the media business, as revenues double, valuation triples.” Forbes has very definitely become a global franchise. It’s seeing most of its growth on the Internet, and most of that growth is non-U.S. “But we’ll never give up on the magazine,” he said.

Tags: , , ,