Reflections & analysis about innovation, technology, startups, investing, healthcare, and more .... with a focus on Minnesota, Land of 10,000 Lakes. Blogging continuously since 2005.

Tag: Graeme Thickins (Page 24 of 55)

Google’s Annual Letter

I just read Google’s latest annual report. Well, not the whole thing, but the best part — the letter from the cofounders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin. Actually, this year’s letter is written by Larry, since the two trade off. Googlelogo [I had the privilege of meeting Larry Page at a conference in March 2002, when the company had fewer than 200 employees. Still mad I didn’t slip him my resume.]
Wow, what a company!  But I guess you don’t need me to tell you that… 🙂  Every time I ever meet anyone from Google, it’s a good experience. And there aren’t many companies I can say that about. The 2007 annual report has been out for a few weeks, I guess, but I was just now able to take some time to dig into it. I think everyone should read the letter, not just shareholders.  So, here it is….

Excerpted from Google’s Annual Report 2007:

Letter from the Founders

Introduction
It is amazing to me that it has been nearly ten years since Sergey and I founded Google. When we went public, we promised to write a yearly founders’ letter in a frank style to keep all of you updated on our progress. We’ve taken turns writing the letter, and this year that responsibility falls to me.

We have seen our company scale tremendously, to more than 17,000 employees in 20 countries worldwide. But what’s even more amazing to me are the possibilities that appear before us—close enough to envision, but important enough to inspire our best efforts. I’m excited and hopeful we will continue to make progress in a wide variety of significant areas. I’m also happy to report that Sergey, Eric, and I continue to work together fabulously. I feel very lucky to be working with them and with our whole growing team (growing mostly just in numbers, despite our excellent food).

Speaking of our team, I wanted to give our deep thanks to George Reyes, our retiring chief financial officer. He has served Google extremely well. I also could not be more grateful to our users, customers, Googlers (our employees), and investors who help bring everything that is Google to life.
I will try to keep this letter relatively short, but I want to cover a lot of ground. I figure if you are interested in a particular area, you can just use Google to get more depth.

Still Searching
Search is a really hard problem. To do a perfect job, you would need to understand all the world’s information, and the precise meaning of every query. With all that understanding, you would then have to produce the perfect answer instantly. We are making significant progress, but remain a long way from perfection. We’re so serious about improving search that more than a third of our people are working on it. Another third work on advertising. We have dramatically improved our understanding of all the different languages, the meanings and synonyms of words, and the many different types of specialized information such as businesses and products. We continue our effort to extract more and more real meaning from the web in order to help people find the right answers. We recently improved universal search, integrating different types of relevant information, such as video, maps, news, books, images, and more, right into your search results.

Sometimes you don’t get a good answer to a search because the information simply isn’t available on the web. So we are working hard to encourage ecosystems that can generate more content from more authors and creators. For example, we recently announced an early version of a tool called "knol" to help people generate and organize more high-quality authored content.

Systems that facilitate high-quality content creation and editing are crucial for the Internet’s continued growth. Our AdSense program also helps the content ecosystem by letting any author or publisher instantly make money by inserting Google-brokered ads into their pages. This helps them pay people to write more great content in a virtuous and profitable cycle for everyone.

In all of these efforts, of course, the trust of our users is paramount. We simply will not bias our search results for financial reasons. Our ads are separated from the search results and clearly labeled. We believe strongly in maintaining the integrity of search.

I’m happy to report that we have a tremendous number of ideas to further improve search. Just about every week, we implement a new (and often clever) improvement to our basic search system. We will continue to work very hard in this area for a long time to come.

Advertising
Advertising is even harder than search. Not only do you have to find the right ad for every situation, but you have to handle paying customers! We have developed very sophisticated advertising systems designed to benefit both users and advertisers. For users, we strive to produce relevant advertising as good as the main content or search results. For advertisers, we provide tools to target and tune their advertising and accurately measure the results of their spending. Just as with search, we devise new clever improvements to our advertising system nearly every week. Fundamentally, every advertisement you see from Google results from a real-time auction conducted among advertisers. Imagine if we had a real auctioneer, how breathless and tired she would become!

Our advertising system works well, but we still have tremendous opportunities to improve it. For example, I just did a search for natural swimming pool, which returned eight righthandside ads, with only the last two of those somewhat relevant. This is both good and bad news. The good news is that we have enough breadth to have some relevant ads for an unusual topic. Furthermore, it is certainly possible to produce more relevant ads that would be valuable to both the user and the advertiser. Also, a user interested in natural pools is probably worth a considerable amount of money if there is enough competition among advertisers to bid up the auction price. The bad news is that we aren’t doing a good enough job yet for this natural pools query and many others. We also happened to have a number of local pool suppliers advertising in the San Francisco area for this query. Locally targeted advertising is another important area for us to grow both in revenue and relevance.

This general problem of ad targeting is very difficult and requires cooperation from huge numbers of advertisers. We continue to make significant progress on this challenging but exceptionally worthwhile problem. Sergey and I spend an action-packed hour nearly every week reviewing the noteworthy changes to the ads system.

70-20-10
We are still keeping to our long-standing plan of devoting 70% of our resources to search and advertising. We debate where we should classify our Apps (Gmail, Docs, etc.) products, but they currently fall into the 20% of resources we devote to related businesses. We use the remaining 10% of our resources on areas that are farther afield but have huge potential, such as Android. We strongly believe that allocating modest resources to new areas is crucial to continuing to innovate. This 10% of our resources generates a tremendous amount of interest and press, precisely because these projects are different and new. Often, we find small teams of only a few people suddenly command huge attention worldwide. That’s useful to keep in mind as you read about Google-the vast majority of our resources are working on our core businesses: search and advertising.

Of course, the needs of the 70% projects are different from the needs of the smaller 10% projects. While I would like to report we understand how to structure these perfectly, we are still actively evolving how we create, manage, and compensate these different kinds of projects. This is a crucial area of focus as we work to recruit and retain the best people, and keep them really happy, organized, and productive.

Acquisitions
Throughout our history, we have acquired more than 50 companies. Our goal is to be the best home for amazing companies that want to be acquired. We acquire companies in all different stages of development, but I will cover some of the larger deals here. We acquired YouTube a bit more than a year ago, and it has been growing like gangbusters. Eric worked with YouTube leaders Chad and Steve to establish a largely independent operating structure, with YouTube remaining in a separate office in San Bruno, about 25 miles from the main Googleplex. This is working well.

When we acquired Postini last year, we significantly enhanced our enterprise email capabilities and reinforced our commitment to serve the enterprise market. And by the time you read this, our acquisition of DoubleClick will have likely been cleared in Europe as well as the U.S. We are fortunate that DoubleClick’s headquarters is in the same building as our Manhattan Googleplex, which will make for easier communication between the combined teams, now totaling a few thousand people. I believe DoubleClick’s expertise in display advertising will be a tremendous addition to Google and will help open up new opportunities in this important market.

Apps
We have made tremendous strides in our web applications. I am writing this using Google Docs. I don’t have to worry that my computer hard drive might fail and lose my work, because it is automatically being saved into the Google network cloud. Sharing what I write is easy. My colleagues can write and edit the live copy without having to email endless revisions (my writing needs a lot of revising!). You can also create spreadsheets and presentations in Docs. Every week, I approve a Google spreadsheet with a summary of every single hire we are making worldwide. With Google Apps, you can collaborate and share all types of documents and calendars with other people in your organization in seconds.

Gmail continues to enjoy tremendous growth, and now has a brand new implementation that’s faster and makes it easier for us to add new features. Instant messaging within Gmail- which works right inside your browser with no installation-has been a big hit. We’re also planning to roll out a plethora of new features. We are working hard to combine our many Apps offerings into a more coherent set of products that "just work." I use Google Apps every day for all of my work.

Our products are improving quickly and have incredibly powerful sharing and chat functionality that wasn’t possible before the web.

We’ve started the next phase in productivity software. That phase is about working with everyone seamlessly and effortlessly. Our goal is fast, easy access to create or share from any computer in the world. No futzing with software required. Just open your browser.

Mobile
Android is our newly announced mobile phone platform. We’ve gathered more than 30 companies together into Android’s Open Handset Alliance. The goals of Android are ambitious: We aim to make your phone work better than your computer. Android is very open, so you can run any software, just like a computer. Today, Android is released as a software toolkit for developers based on Linux, Java, and high-end web browser technologies. We and our partners are very much looking forward to having Android ship in real devices. We are excited about realizing the potential of that little computer in your pocket (your cool, web-centric Android phone).

In addition to Android, we endeavor to make all of our products work well with existing phones and have been quite successful with much greater usage in a wide variety of areas. We have been working to try to apply some of the open-access principles of the Internet to increase user choice and innovation in the mobile space. We also have been active with a 10% project focused on wireless spectrum, which has created a great deal of interest. We were successful in helping convince the US Federal Communications Commission to attach most of our desired openness principles to the ongoing 700 Mhz auction.

The World
It turns out the real world matters to people, in the form of maps, satellite images, business locations, bike paths, and all other types of geographic data. We are hard at work in all these domains. We even launched photographs of nearly everything at street level in 30 metro areas, integrated right into Google Maps (click the Street View button). Google Earth literally goes out of this world with a new Sky mode (just click on the Sky icon). You can see an amazing view of the night sky, complete with super-high resolution images from the Hubble telescope that you can zoom right into.

Speaking of the world, we don’t want it to end-especially by environmental catastrophe. Consequently, we are working hard on our own considerable energy use in data centers by making them far more efficient. We’re working directly on our own carbon/methane off sets to cover our usage. But we are all on the same Spaceship Earth, and we need to energetically address harmful emissions. To this end, we launched RE<C, an initiative to make renewable energy cheaper than coal-fired plants. We have started our own internal development effort, and have made investments in promising technologies. We are working on new clean technologies that could make more energy than we have now, and do it at a lower cost. Our goal is to generate a gigawatt (roughly enough to power San Francisco) of clean, cheap energy in years, not decades. If we are successful, we will not only help the world, but also make substantial profits.

We continue our efforts to make Google more global. Google is available in 160 different local country domains and 117 languages (including some obscure ones like "Swedish Chef" – Bork, Bork, Bork). While Google is available virtually everywhere there is Internet access, our business operations are in just 20 countries. We are still working to establish a significant business presence in places such as the Middle East. As we expand our operations and hire our first employees in another country, that part of Google feels like a startup.

We started Google.org with the idea of eclipsing the impact of Google itself while focusing on more philanthropic causes. Though we are working on extremely tough problems in difficult locations, we have made significant strides. We have established several main focus areas, including predicting and preventing disease; improving public services by informing and empowering people; and increasing economic growth and job creation through stimulating small- and medium-sized enterprises.

Conclusion
By organizing the world’s information and making it universally accessible and useful, we’re helping people worldwide make better decisions and improve their lives. I feel lucky — I am lucky — to be involved in this important ecosystem of better information. While almost all of our effort is focused on important improvements to core search and advertising, the small percentage left over is producing a lot of important innovation and even more notice from the world. I could not be more excited about all the possibilities for Googlers to produce amazing computer experiences that their mothers and fathers — and hundreds of millions of other people — will use every day.

Larry Page
Co-Founder; President, Products

Sergey Brin

Co-Founder; President, Technology

————-

What do you think about this year’s letter?  What stands out for you?  Anything else you wished they would have addressed?  (Note: I also blogged today about the Google-led initiative called "OpenSocial," over on my other blog, at NewMediaWise.com.)

iPhone and Flash – Apple and Adobe at War?

Things are getting real interesting out there on the iPhone front, in so many ways. Here’s a case in point: this fastest-ever growing mobile phone platform, as originally introduced last year, did not support Flash (and still doesn’t), but it’s clear that Adobe, the company behind Flash, would sure like to…uh…do something about that? Iphonemultipleimages

Perhaps you saw the news that broke last week related to this. Here are the two items I caught:
• iPhone Still Not Ready for Flash (from CMP’s funky, new Contentinople site)
• Who Needs Flash on iPhone More, Adobe or Apple? (from the great blog "last100," part of the ReadWriteWeb network)

After reading these, I decided to ask a couple of my smart local buddies to do guest posts. First, my longtime designer friend "PXLated" — who’s an almost-as-longtime Apple and Adobe user and follower. Get this, he goes this far back with Adobe technology (I love this story): when he first called ’em for support, John Warnock took the call. [Yeah, for you trivia buffs, that was the founder.] I asked PXLated what the heck was going on, and if he could give me his take over the weekend. His comments follow:

Adobe’s been pushing Apple to put Flash on the iPhone and is using the blogosphere to promote its cause ("we need Flash, we need Flash", blah, blah, blah). Adobe and their surrogates — you know, the old interactive CD developers whose businesses went tits-up when the web took off — try to play it that Flash is a web standard and, to have the full web on the iPhone, you need Flash.

First of all, it’s not a standard. It might be ubiquitous, but it’s not in any way, shape, or form a web standard. There are many things delivered over the Internet (the web, mail, etc), and Flash is interactive multimedia delivered over the internet. There happens to be a Flash plug-in that allows it to be played within a browser, but it’s not "standard" web technology.

So, Apple has basically said no, the full version of Flash is too resource-intensive and power hungry, and even taxes desktop machines. Load up some Flash sites (or several) and it can bring your browser to a screeching halt and max your CPU usage. I’ve seen it written that it’s even worse on Macs than on Windows, as Adobe has never optimized the Flash player for the Mac. Then there’s "Flash Lite," a version that’s on some phones. But, according to what I’ve read, and what Jobs has said, it is too lightweight, in that it won’t render Flash sites as we know them — only ads and simpler stuff like animations. And it won’t even display stuff created in the latest version of Flash.

So, currently, there isn’t a version of Flash that Apple will allow. The full version of Flash is too heavy, and Flash Lite is too light.  Bottom line, there is no version appropriate for the iPhone/iPod Touch.

The current brouhaha is that Apple came out with their iPhone SDK, and Adobe’s current CEO said in a conference call last week that his firm would use that to develop Flash for the iPhone. The reality is they can’t without deeper ties to the underlying operating system, or to the Safari browser. That isn’t possible without Apple’s help and approval.  It seems his engineers explained the facts of life to him, and a day later he corrected himself.

So, now Adobe is back to square one.

My guess is there’s a lot of politics going on behind the scene, and some of it is historical:
1) Adobe raped Jobs in licensing fees for using display postscript at NEXT.
2) They tried to do that again at Apple for OSX, and Jobs said screw you and developed the whole display technology using PDF. He could do this because Adobe had opened the specs so PDF could become a standard. Open=no licensing fees… 🙂
3) Adobe probably pissed Jobs off (as well as all Mac users) when they were one of the last software companies to release OSX versions of their programs, and used Carbon (a bridge) rather than Cocoa (the native method).
4) Adobe then again took forever to make their apps native for Intel, probably further straining their relationship with Jobs.

So, basically, I would guess there is no love lost with Jobs when it comes to Adobe. Hey, they screwed with him when he was down.

The problems for Adobe are many. First, all their big apps (including Photoshop and Illustrator) are mature, and there just isn’t much they can add to them to make people upgrade. They locked themselves into a development box where they can’t utilize all the great underlying OS features to create a nice upgrade, either. So, their only place for real growth is to ride the next wave in computing — mobile — but they can’t if Flash isn’t as ubiquitous on phones as it is desktops. So, there are a bunch of choke points and pressures.

The iPhone points to the future and is a grand success, but Apple prefers to use and promote web standards — like Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG), Javascript (Ajax), and the latest in the HTML specs — rather than proprietary things like Flash.  Microsoft is introducing a Flash competitor called Silverlight. So, Adobe is desperate because they know the mobile phone/browsing market is many times bigger than the desktop market. If they can’t get Flash to be as ubiquitous on mobile devices as it is on the desktop, the jig is up and they could miss out on the whole next generation of computing. And all those Flash developers will have to learn new skills.

It’s desperation time for the whole bunch, hence the latest outcry.

Thanks, PXLated. This will indeed be very interesting to watch! [Note: I guess I won’t go long on Adobe stock.]

Not being one to ever be satisfied, I then just had to ask yet another of our mutual smart friends for his opinion on the news. Steve Borsch has an excellent blog at Connecting the Dots, and also blogs with me occasionally at Minnov8. He’s very savvy in the ways of Apple and Adobe, having worked for Apple for several years in sales in the ’90s. And he’s as plugged in to where things are headed in the new world of "the Internet as platform" as anyone I know. Here are his comments:

Any of us in the tech sector knows that shrink-wrapped software is dead; the personal computer will be less and less necessary going forward; and that multiple device types connected to the Internet — with most of the processing being done "in the cloud" or at hosted facilities — will be the way most of us get our news, information, entertainment, and social connections going forward.

As the Internet increasingly morphs into the "platform" for applications — either Web, desktop, or the new category of rich internet applications (RIAs) — runtime "containers" will be critical for any company hoping to be relevant, and Apple’s name has come up as one of the most absent players in this space. Ironically, iTunes is often used as the best example of a rich internet application, since one can rip and manage music on the personal computer desktop; share it within the home; buy and download music, movies, and video "up in the cloud" along with cover art; and subscribe to free audio and video podcasts.

Adobe’s AIR (Adobe Integrated Runtime) is an RIA platform with incredible functionality and the capability to "collapse" many sorts of technologies into a "container" that runs in a Web browser or on a personal computer desktop. Microsoft’s Silverlight takes a different approach (and many design tools exist for creating and deploying Silverlight "containers"), but the essence is the same: next generation hybrid applications that attempt to marry the best of the desktop with the best of what’s delivered over the Internet from the cloud. In fact, buzz has it that Silverlight was a direct strategic response to the ubiquity of Flash (which is on something like 97% of all browsers), and that Microsoft’s abdicating the runtime of video, audio, and animation to Adobe was a very bad idea…especially if the company was interested in cloud computing (which it is now!).

My belief is that Apple isn’t going to sit this one out, and the Flash controversy is all about positioning their approach (whenever it’s revealed), since they have all the building blocks necessary: the most ubiquitous creative platform, called Macintosh; Quicktime (which I’d argue is the best video container); Safari on both Mac and Windows (built on the fast, completely Web-standard browser engine called "WebKit"); incredibly simple "clip" technologies like WebClip (a fast and easy way to clip a section of a web page, and it automagically turns into a widget); and the fastest growing mobile device (iPhone); and many, many rumors of upcoming device-types leveraging the critically acclaimed "touch" technology used in the iPhone interface.

Add to that Apple’s famed ability to deliver easy-to-use interfaces to historically difficult processes and technologies. Probably my best example is the phenomenally good-looking movies and, most specifically, DVDs that can be created with iMovie and iDVD. Having grown up in the interactive space with videodisc and CD-ROM, I can tell you that creating and delivering a DVD is so laughingly simple that one of my non-technical friends (who can barely figure out the radio in his car) has delivered some of the best-looking DVDs I’ve ever watched.

My prediction is that Apple will be delivering different "touch" form-factors in the next six months (along with faster 3G iPhones), as well as touch modifications to their notebook platforms. As user-generated content continues to explode — and demand accelerates for tools to create and deliver it — Apple will be right there with what’s needed to create and deliver at runtime.

There you have it, folks. What my smartest, tech-savviest friends say is behind all this Apple/Adobe posturing regarding Flash. In other words, there’s a whole lot more than meets the eye.  And your intrepid reporters at Tech-Surf-Blog [wherever I can find them!] are out there for you, right in the middle of it all.

(For another take on Apple and its culture, check out this great cover story just published in Wired Magazine: Evil/Genius: How Apple Wins By Breaking All the Rules.)

Now, you need to tell me what *you* think about the future of Apple and the iPhone.  Don’t be shy — comment below and show your stuff…

Alltop Coverage Misses the Point

Guy Kawasaki’s latest startup, Alltop, launched officially yesterday, and — not unsurprisingly — got a lot of play on the strength of Guy’s (insane) popularity. AlltoplogotagBut a dirty little question still needs to be asked. More on that later…. 


[Photo of Guy taken by me at last year’s National Pond Hockey Championships in Minneapolis.]

Guykawasakihockey
All the usual suspects covered the Alltop launch, right on cue: Arrington peed all over it at TechCrunch, while Mashable gave it a breathless blurb and did a video interview of Guy from SXSW, and my friend Richard MacManus at ReadWriteWeb gave it a very fair and complete analysis.  Another person I respect, Chris Shipley, executive producer of DEMO, even weighed in favorably at her Guidewire blog. They all, in varying degrees, got the point that this news & blog aggregation site is aimed at the non-RSS literate web population, which is huge. 

However, it seems TechCrunch and its commenters, as geeky and early adopter as they are, don’t seem to want to recognize that anyone could possibly ever need such a site. It’s obvious they don’t grasp how large the non-RSS population is. They use RSS readers all day long and therefore the whole world must?  Chris Shipley, on the other hand, certainly does get the point about the market Alltop is aiming for with this new site. (And she has something to say to TechCrunch in a later post on her blog.)

I agree with Chris. Alltop is undoubtedly a useful site for mainstream web users, those who do not use RSS readers and are not likely to ever do so because the technology is just too darn geeky. Might some of them adopt reader "start pages" like iGoogle, NetVibes, and PageFlakes?  Sure, those are pretty simple, and many mainstream web users could set up their own customized news readers (have already) — but they do in fact have go to that trouble. I think it’s a sure bet that the majority of mainstream web users won’t.  And, for this large population, an aggregator of many sites — a destination site with a single-page view of a whole lot of stuff, from a trusted source, with a very clean, simple UI — definitely has value.

I find it useful myself, and will recommend it. I especially like the "bird’s-eye view" of an entire category on a single page (and there are an impressive 40 categories), and the way you can hover over any headline to see the first part of the story is a real convenience and timesaver.  Is it rocket-science web technology?  No, but mainstream users don’t care about that, either. They just want something that’s fast, easy, and useful… for them.

So, what’s the big question that still needs to be asked about Alltop, which none of the coverage I’ve seen so far gets to?  It’s this: how does Kawasaki intend to make money with the site?  After all, he’s a startup expert, and a VC in his own right as a founder of Garage Technology Ventures. Or is this not a business, just an experiment of some sort?  Does Alltop even have a business plan yet, a business model?  One assumes that this is more than a hobby with Kawasaki — proving he can launch consumer Web 2.0 sites with little money. His previous attempt, some months ago, was Truemors (still going and growing) — a site he later boasted cost him less than $13,000 to develop and launch. But the same question could be applied to that site as well: so what?  He’s now proved that popular authors/pundits/speakers can launch web sites that can get some attention. So, the point then is…?

[By the way, for those of my readers in the Upper Midwest, in case you don’t know: Kawasaki’s developers for both sites are the folks at Electric Pulp in Sioux Falls, SD, one of the perennial sponsors of our great local BarCamp events here in Minnesota, Minnebar and Minnedemo. Hey, Pulpers, way to go! We all now know you aren’t getting paid much 🙂 …but we assume you’re having fun?]

Some of the Great People I Met at GSP and ETech

As a followup to my previous blog posts and innumerable Twitters (starting on March3) about the Graphing Social Patterns and ETech conferences this past week, I just wanted to say-hey to all those I met or ran into — at least those I got cards from. It was fun chatting with all of you, and I look forward to staying in touch! After all, we’re supposed to be "social" at these things, right?  In fact, please Facebook me and/or hook up with me on LinkedIn (see links just to the right in my sidebar), if we aren’t already connected (or I will do that from my end). Timoreillyonstage

Hello again to the following folks I already knew and ran into at GSP or ETech (listed alphabetically):
•Sean Ammirati, VP at mSpoke and ReadWriteWeb contributor (PA)
•Dan Carroll, CEO, Intelligent Media Platform and Somr.org (formerly Minneapolis, now Mountain View)
•Rick Enrico, CEO, JuiceMedia (San Diego)
•Aaron Fulkerson, Cofounder, Mindtouch (San Diego)
•Chris Gammill, Web Product Marketing Consultant (LA)
•Dan Grigsby, uber-developer, Unpossible.com (MN)
•Alex Iskold, CEO of AdaptiveBlue and ReadWriteWeb contributor (NJ)
•Jeremiah Owyang, new Forrester Research analyst rockstar (SF) Etechcrowdstage

And it was great meeting all these new people (listed alphabetically); apologies to those I may have missed because I didn’t get a card:
•Bill Binning, CMO, Jaduka (TX)
•Ben Benner, CTO, Jaduka (TX)
•Derek Dukes, Founder, Dipity (SF)
•Pete Forde, Partner, Unspace (Toronto)
•Chris Hendricks, VP Bus Dev, Travature (San Diego)
•Kristofer Layon, Web Project Coord, U of MN (Go, Gophers!)
•Ian Kennedy, Product Mgr, MyBlogLog/Yahoo (SF)
•Sanyu Kirulata, Queen’s School of Business MBA candidate (Canada)
•Vince Kohli, CEO, BizInnovativ (NJ)
•Chris Messina, Citizen Agency/DISO-project.org (SF)
•David Recordon, Open Platforms Technical Lead, SixApart (SF)
•Jodee Rich, CEO, PeopleBrowsr.com (Sydney)
•Jeff Roberto, Marketing/PR Director, Friendster (SF)
•Jason Rubenstein, Cofounder, Just Three Words (LA)
•Todd Sampson, Cofounder and Dir-Tech Mktg, MyBlogLog/Yahoo (SF)
•Maria Sipka, CEO, Linqia (Spain via Sydney)…and she surfs, too!

I hope those of you who read this will let me know what you thought of the events (just email me at graeme at thickins dot com). Best of luck to all of you in your current endeavors! And I certainly hope our respective social graphs continue to intersect in good ways….

Getcodingopensocial

[By the way, if you’d like to get access to any speaker presentation files from either event, they’re being posted on the following pages, which the O’Reilly people said are being updated as speakers choose to add their slides:
GSP speaker presentations (this is the specific page at Slideshare.net where speakers were asked to post their slides)
ETech speaker presentations (a page on the O’Reilly site that has several postings already, and I assume more will be added ongoing).
Keep checking these links if you don’t see what you want.]

UPDATE 3/10/08: To update link for GSP speaker presentations.

UPDATE 3/17/08: To give you yet another link to the GSP presentations, this one the official O’Reilly page, which recently went live: Graphing Social Patterns West 2008 – Presentation Files.

ETech 08: Strangest Session Title Goes to…”How to Kick Ass”

Kathy Sierra was one of the speakers in the morning session of this second day of ETech. She’s a perennial at this event, though missed last year. One of the few women in this largely man’s world of developers (esp on stage), but she’s very popular. Kathysierraetech
Her thing is "creating passionate users," and who can’t like that?  Her talk today was titled to arouse curiosity, I suppose. What it was about, as I Twittered during her talk, is that it’s healthy to get involved in something that isn’t the main thing you excel at. She cited a guy taking pix of her in the aisle with a big camera on a tripod, and how he was a leading open-source guy, but has become a kick-ass photographer. Kickingassthreshold
She said it’s not about natural talent, but just the ability to put in time….and not about making money at something [oh, like maybe blogging, perhaps? 🙂 ].

Fast forward to the punchline: we finally got to what she was trying to tell all the hard-working, no-outside-life developers, hackers, and assorted geeks in the audience. It was to "get unplugged," get away from all the distractions ("partial attentions") we all have in our lives, and "focus on the things you care about." 

Ah, surfing…it won’t be long now. (Sorry, couldn’t resist.)

« Older posts Newer posts »