Well, the Google Code Search announcement is sure abuzzin’ out there. This CNet story popped up…



And Nik Cubrilovic posted about it at TechCrunch a few hours ago, quoted herewith:
“All of these search engines have a long way to go before they become a shortcut way for developers to find code – especially considering that most developers are astute at using ordinary search engines to find what they are looking for. Searching for a phrase like “drop-down menu in ajax” won’t return anything usefull, so developers who don’t know which specific string within code they are looking for will have a hard time. Track record would suggest that Google are the company to most likely get this right, by combining the information they have in their main search engine with the source code data for better results … This looks like bad news for the startups in this space who will need to further innovate, but it is good news for Google, a company that hasn’t really been hitting home runs recently with some of it’s (sic) recent new products.”
But in an earlier post this morning on Digital Alchemy, Krugle gets a nice review:
“Krugle’s search interface is much more sophisticated, incorporating ‘sub-tabbed’ browsing and tree navigation of source code, which makes code a lot easier to read and interpret. Google does have one interesting feature: it indicates how many identical files are in its database, allowing you to see how widespread a piece of code is.”
More soon from Krugle on their reaction to this announcement. One can only surmise the startup had a crisis plan of sorts in place for the prospect of this day arriving….
Tags: Google Code Search,
Krugle, Koders
Not much at the
See some of my coverage
The sleezy entertainment industry goons need to back off and let innovation bloom. And they will, because there aren’t any deep pockets there to sue yet. The question instead, though (as the article says), is the huge amount of capital it will take to keep YouTube going. The boys at Sequoia have already thrown in $11.5 million — but that’s just the beginning of what this thing will need. Try $2 million a month, some say, just to run the service. Wow, do they need ad revenues — fast! Meantime, how much more will the VCs bet? Well, don’t think they (and their friends) can’t pour it on — and will. Yet there are those already predicting YouTube’s demise….read
Rich Karlgaard of Forbes. [Or as Guy Kawasaki, another friend and business partner, calls him, “Brother Rich.”]
One industry where this is happening is newspapers, with the stock of the New York Times, for example, at half what it was in 2002. Why is the industry in trouble? “Craig’s List is one reason,” he said, “a company with 23 employees.” He noted that McKinsey said the topple rate will triple again, and he gave some reasons why this volatility will stay with us. “The backside of Moore’s Law is the part that’s important. As performance increases, prices drop 30% a year. Suddenly, hundreds of millions more people can afford technology every year.” He also cited the example of Google bootstrapping its way early on, with the founders not taking equity investment but instead maxing out their credit cards.
Read more about that in
“It’s growing at 70% year-over-year, and will have more ad revenue than the magazine by the end of 2007.” He said that’s what got Elevation Partners interested. “In the media business, as revenues double, valuation triples.” Forbes has very definitely become a global franchise. It’s seeing most of its growth on the Internet, and most of that growth is non-U.S. “But we’ll never give up on the magazine,” he said.
Recent Comments