Reflections & analysis about innovation, technology, startups, investing, healthcare, and more .... with a focus on Minnesota, Land of 10,000 Lakes. Blogging continuously since 2005.

Category: Venture Capital/M&A/Angels (Page 34 of 53)

Raising Startup Money? Here’s 20 Ways

This is not the first post I’ve done that mentions Tech Coast Angels, one of the largest and oldest angel investing organizations in the country, which is of course in Southern California. (Here’s another good one from about 10 months ago.) Interesting that the term “angel” originated in the techcoastangelsentertainment business, but TCA has little to do with Hollywood. It sure has a whole lot to do with funding technology startups in that part of the country, though! (I also had the good fortune to do an extensive interview in early 2007 with the founder of Tech Coast Angels, the late Louis Villalobos, which was later published in The Angel Journal.)

This organization is actually comprised of four networks of angels covering a large part of the SoCal geography, from Santa Barbara down to San Diego. One of my favorite places, Orange County, is where the largest and oldest of these networks is situated.  And that’s where the subject of this post hails from.

Frank Peters, a successful, now semi-retired software entrepreneur (he marketed his product to Wall Street firms starting back in the ’80s), has been active as an angel investor for 10 years, and at the time of this post he’d been with Tech Coast Angels for five years. On the side, he produced a great podcast for a few years called “The Frank Peters Show” — subtitled “Startup Stories in Angel Investing and Venture Capital.” He was prolific — averaging about 60 podcasts per year for a while. Pretty amazing! These episodes provided some great listening for both entrepreneurs and angel investors. He had some excellent interviews with really interesting subjects. It was a podcast that definitely helped people better understand angel investing.

Frank did one great episode that was an interview with two experienced fellow TCA angels: Dave Berkus (how many angels do you know who’ve done 60 deals?), and Sid Mohasseb, who runs Venture Farm, which he described as “an equity funding source that adds hands-on experience to the execution process.” The topic of the podcast was “20 Ways to Fund Your Startup” — a list that Dave Berkus developed, but which all three guys discussed in this one-hour+ episode.  Here’s a quick rundown of the gist of that discussion:

THE BIG LIST: 20 Way$$ to Feed Your Startup Habit
Of the various ways to raise startup capital, angel financing is about in the middle of the continuum, Dave said. Some founders, however, try it too early — they don’t bootstrap enough first.  If you do, say the panelists, you’ll have a better chance of getting an audience in the first place to be considered to receive funding. So, here’s the rundown, courtesy of Dave, with some points noted by him and the others as he went through the list:

1) Credit cards – this can be $20-30k, even $50k in some cases, which will require a personal guarantee (but not mortgaging your house).
2) Securing arrangements with suppliers to slow down payments – assuming the business is started – or seeking deferred payment – lawyers typically do that – many even do pro bono work as a way to give back to the community.
3) Take out another mortgage – scary for many, perhaps, but rates remain quite low; it shows the founder has significant belief in what he or she is doing.
4) Wealthy relatives – “if you were born lucky” – they’re more likely than others to invest.
5) Friends – “means you’re getting lucky, if you have good ones!”  – can be on your board of advisors, too, which costs you nothing.
6) Take on consulting work – even let your company be both a consulting and product development business at first.
7) Affiliate with an incubator – whether physical or virtual – they can help build your management team and more.
8) Well-connected attorney – angels listen to their recommendations.
9) A “Rented” CFO – they don’t get paid for just getting the money, but for the financial systems they set up – the analysis of the data is what they deliver, and credibility.
10) Recruit a professional CFO – angels feel much more comfortable then.
11) Get prepaid licenses for your technology – a combination of selling service as well as product – maintenance agreements can be part of this (16-20% of list price of software) – recurring revenue –  customers are essentially paying for the engineering and product development – helps refine the value proposition – you don’t need to give it away for free.
12) Accelerated payments – of course, you have to have a revenue stream first.
13) Royalties for very specific projects – let those fund your product development – seek out anyone that can benefit from the technology (not just your main target customers).
14) Angel financing – “later the better” to approach them, because you’re then more likely to get funded – however, can be anywhere on the continuum – the later it is, the more likely you’ll get funded (angels will look at what you’ve done so far – how many of the above you’ve taken advantage of) – if you go to angels earlier, your valuation will be lower.
15) Bank line of credit – $50k is available to almost anybody with good credit (with personal guarantee).
16) Strategic partnerships – customer or supplier, helping to develop, promising to distribute, etc – helps to define channels for later sales and distribution.
17) Venture capital, pension funds
18) Private placements
19) Professional restructurers
20) Investment bank, public offering

Dave pointed out again that angels are more in the middle of this continuum — they aren’t where you start.  “They’re an avenue for the sophisticated entrepreneur that understands all the other sources and where the risk is, and how fast they need the money.”

In the closing discussion, Frank commented that TCA was ten years old at that point, and was getting more sophisticated.  Yes, the others agreed — and “more prudent, cautious, and jaded.”  But Dave added that it was certain they were much more powerful as a group than as individuals. Frank noted that the angel financing business, at least for TCA, things slow down towards the end of the year — until around mid-January.

Then, the three discussed a recent university study, in which certain TCA members participated, called “Angels in Groups,” for which a large amount of data on angel investments was gathered.  One of the biggest surprises of the study, they agreed, was the average length of time to a liquidity event. Many angels think of it as generally 3 to 5 years, but they noted that was not happening for those deals studied.  Dave said the study found that 61% of the angels surveyed had returns greater than the amount they invested, “meaning 39% didn’t!”  The conclusion is that angel investing is more risky than most people think. A diversity of investments is important “before you can count your chickens,” said Dave. Luis Villalobos, the founder of TCA, thought a portfolio of 25 or more investments was a minimum to expect good returns. The study showed that success happens when the angel is involved in the business. The entrepreneur benefits from the sharing of the experience of angels. Finally, the study found that it doesn’t tend to pay for angels to reinvest, which is somewhat worrisome, the panelists noted. “TCA traditionally funds 2-3% of deals they see,” said Dave. “But when we’re ready to take deals to VCs, those firms only invest in 1% of what they see, on average.”  Therein lies a problem, because angels often to have to invest a second or third time to keep the business going before it’s ready for the VCs. ‘”It’s a game of patience,” Dave said.

Frank Peters concluded this particular podcast by saying he thinks there’s a need to “start testifying more about angel investing, more education, chewing over issues.”

I like the list of 20 sources of startup money, though — it’s a list that all new and aspiring entrepreneurs need to know. There really are a ton of ways, and most of them do qualify as bootstrapping… or just plain being clever!

Raising Startup Money? Here’s 20 Ways

Speaking of Southern California [my last post was on Hollywood, if you can believe that], I think it’s time I did another post about Tech Coast Angels, one of the largest and oldest angel investing organizations in the country. Interesting that the term "angel" originated in the entertainment business, but TCA has little to do with Hollywood — rather, they have a whole lot to do with funding technology startups. Techcoastangels
This group is actually comprised of four networks of angels covering a large part of the SoCal geography, from Santa Barbara down to San Diego. My second favorite place, Orange County, is where the largest and oldest of these networks is situated.  And that’s where the subject of this post hails from.

Frank Peters, a successful, now semi-retired software entrepreneur (he sold his product to Wall Street firms starting back in the ’80s), has been active as an angel investor for 10 years, and the past five with Tech Coast Angels. On the side, he’s been producing a great podcast for the past two years called "The Frank Peters Show" — subtitled "Startup Stories in Angel Investing and Venture Capital." He’s averaged about 60 podcasts per year so far (pretty amazing). It’s very worthwhile listening for both entrepreneurs and current or potential angel investors — these are great interviews with really interesting subjects, and will definitely help you better understand angel investing. If you have an iPod or iPhone, they’re ideal to listen to in the car to make better use of that commute or long road trip.

Frank’s latest podcast is an interview with two experienced fellow TCA angels: Dave Berkus (how many angels do you know who’ve done 60 deals?), and Sid Mohasseb, who runs Venture Farm, which he describes as "an equity funding source that adds hands-on experience to the execution process." The topic of this podcast is "20 Ways to Fund Your Startup" — which is a list that Dave Berkus developed, but which all three guys discuss in this one-hour+ episode. (If you want to skip the general chat at the beginning and cut right to the chase, the "20 Ways" stuff begins at about 28:25 into the podcast.)  Here’s a quick rundown of the gist of the discussion if you don’t have time to listen right now:

Ways to Feed Your Startup Habit
Of the various ways to raise startup capital, angel financing is about in the middle of the continuum, Dave said. Some founders, however, try it too early — they don’t bootstrap enough first.  If you do, say the panelists, you’ll have a better chance of getting an audience in the first place to be considered to receive funding. So, here’s the rundown, courtesy of Dave, with some points noted by him and the others as he went through the list:

1) Credit cards – this can be $20-30k, even $50k in some cases, which will require a personal guarantee (but not mortgaging your house).
2) Securing arrangements with suppliers to slow down payments – assuming the business is started – or seeking deferred payment – lawyers typically do that – many even do pro bono work as a way to give back to the community.
3) Take out another mortgage – scary right now, but rates are quite low – shows founder has significant belief in what he or she is doing.
4) Wealthy relatives – "if you were born lucky" – more likely than others to invest.
5) Friends – "means you’re getting lucky, if you have good ones"  – can be on board of advisors, too, which costs you nothing.
6) Take on consulting work – even let your company be both a consulting and product development business at first.
7) Affiliate with an incubator – whether physical or virtual – they can help build management team, etc.
8) Well-connected attorney – angels listen to their recommendations.
9) "Rented" CFO – they don’t get paid for just getting the money, but for the financial systems they set up – the analysis of the data is what they deliver, and credibility.
10) Recruit a professional CFO – angels feel much more comfortable then.
11) Get prepaid licenses for your technology – a combination of selling service as well as product – maintenance agreements can be part of this (16-20% of list price of software) – recurring revenue –  customers are essentially paying for the engineering and product development – helps refine the value proposition – you don’t need to give it away for free.
12) Accelerated payments – of course, you have to have a rev stream first.
13) Royalties for very specific projects – let those fund your product development – seek out anyone that can benefit from the technology (not just your main target customers).
14) Angel financing – "later the better" to approach them, because you’re then more likely to get funded – however, can be anywhere on the continuum – the later it is, the more likely you’ll get funded (angels will look at what you’ve done so far – how many of the above you’ve taken advantage of) – if you go to angels earlier, your valuation will be lower.
15) Bank line of credit – $50k is available to almost anybody with good credit (with personal guarantee).
16) Strategic partnerships – customer or supplier, helping to develop, promising to distribute, etc – helps to define channels for later sales and distribution.
17) Venture capital, pension funds
18) Private placements
19) Professional restructurers
20) Investment bank, public offering

Dave noted again that angels are in the middle of this continuum.  "They’re an avenue for the sophisticated entrepreneur that understands all the other sources and where the risk is, and how fast they need the money."

In the closing discussion, Frank commented that TCA is ten years old now, and is getting more sophisticated.  Yes, the others agreed — and "more prudent,
cautious, jaded."  But Dave added that it’s certain they’re much more powerful as a group than as individuals. Frank noted that the angel financing business, at least for TCA, slows down at this time of year — from now till about January 10.

Then, the three discussed a recent university study, in which certain TCA members participated, called "Angels in Groups," for which a large amount of data on angel investments was gathered. (The link to the PDF of this study is on Frank’s web page for this podcast (show #132). One of the biggest surprises of the study, they agreed, was the average length of time to a liquidity event. Many angels think of it as generally 3 to 5 years, but they noted that was not happening for those deals studied.  Dave said the study found that 61% of the angels surveyed had returns greater than the amount they invested, "meaning 39% didn’t!"  The conclusion is that angel investing is more risky than most people thought. A diversity of investments is important "before you can count your chickens," said Dave. Luis Villalobos, the founder of TCA, thinks a portfolio of 25 or more investments is a minimum to expect good returns. The study showed that success happens when the angel is involved in the business. The entrepreneur benefits from the sharing of the experience of angels. Finally, the study found that it doesn’t tend to pay for angels to reinvest, which is somewhat worrisome, the panelists noted. "TCA traditionally funds 2-3% of deals they see," said Dave. "But when we’re ready to take deals to VCs, those firms only invest in 1% of what they see, on average."  Therein lies a problem, because angels often to have to invest a second or third time to keep the business going before it’s ready for the VCs. ‘"It’s a game of patience," Dave said.

Frank Peters concluded this podcast by saying he thinks there’s a need to "start testifying more about angel investing, more education, chewing over issues."  And he encourages suggestions for future podcasts by email to him at frank@thefrankpetersshow.com.

UPDATE (11/28):  And here’s a bonus link on Five of the Best Tips for Courting Angels.

‘Defrag’ Conference: Brainstorming the Next Big Thing

Next Sunday, I’m off to Denver for a really cool conference called Defrag. (Here’s the blog, which will tell you what’s really goin’ on.) I’m looking forward to it, because it’s different — a smaller, more intimate kind of event. The kind of event "where you send your brains for a workout," say the producers. Defregconf
There’ll be a couple hundred really smart people participating, many whose names you would know. Folks like Esther Dyson, Jerry Michalski, Clay Shirky, David Weinberger, Doc Searls, Paul Kedrosky, Brad Feld, Jeff Clavier, Chris Shipley, Steve Larsen, and a couple of new players I’ve met in the semantic web movement, Nova Spivack and Alex Iskold. Denverhyatt
And that’s just a few I can remember — there are many more smart Internet minds who’ll be there.  We need this kind of event after Esther Dyson retired her great "PC Forum" conference after the 2006 edition. (I’m so glad I got to cover that one. It was soo timely, and everybody-who-was-anybody was there.)

Defrag is being held at the very cool, new Denver Hyatt. Here’s an invitation to all my friends here in the Minnesota technology community:  please join me at Defrag!  (At least two already are, and we’re flying out together.)  Denver’s not that far — and, hey, you guys need to get out of town once in a while! 🙂  I even have a special discount code that will get you $500 off.  But you have to act fast, since that expires soon: the code is "DefragMN"…and you can use it when you register right here.  I guarantee you, you won’t be sorry you attended this conference!  Check the agenda.

One of the three producers of Defrag is a guy I know named Eric Norlin, and I’m looking forward to meeting the other two. I met Eric back in ’99 through my work with Net Perceptions, and he’s become an even more plugged-in guy since then. He’s been in the digital identity business and has run other conferences, such as Digital ID World.  He lives in Florida now, but was in Colorado for many years, so has lots of contacts there. (He also was based in the Twin Cities for a couple of years, quite some time ago.)  Early on, Eric even worked with the NSA, so he’s just an interesting cat to say the least. It’ll be fun to see him again. Here’s how Eric and friends describe their newest creation:

Defrag is the first conference focused solely on the internet-based tools that transform loads of information into layers of knowledge, and accelerate the “aha” moment. Defrag is about the space that lives in between knowledge management, social networking, collaboration and business intelligence …. it’s a gathering place for the growing community of implementers, users, builders and thinkers that are working on the next wave of software innovation.

The sponsors of Defrag are BEA, Yahoo, Me.dium, Newsgator, ThinkFree, Adaptive Blue, AOL, Dapper, HiveLive, Lijit, Near-Time, Siderean, Microsoft, ZDnet, ProQuo, and Collective Intellect.  For more on the sponsors, see this post on the Defrag blog: All the Cool Kids Are Doing It.

And here’s more insight into what this inaugural Defrag is all about, from another of Eric’s blog posts,  Inter-Twining at Defrag:

One of the earliest phrases that I hit upon to help describe Defrag was ‘networked knowledge’ … That idea — that knowledge is not simply a passive, managed asset, but an active agent in a system that is working for me — is the core of what we’re exploring.

I’m pumped!  Watch for my live blogging next week — Monday and Tuesday, November 5 and 6. Take a look at the agenda and tell me what you like. I especially like "Social Networking in the Enterprise." Cheers.

Widget Summit, Day 1: Advertising & Widgets

[Okay, it’s actually Day 2 now, and I’m sitting in the main hall getting ready for today’s sessions to get rolling.  But I still have posts to do about Day 1! So, please bear with me (bad wi-fi in my hotel, you know….in SF??), while I keep playing catch up…]

"Monetization" is what this panel is about, said Saar Gur, a partner with Charles River Ventures. He introduced Lance Tokuda, the CEO of RockYou, to kick things off — and Lance was happy to brag up his business to no end for us. "We offer 40 widgets…one of every four online users has one…and we’re number-one in engagement," he said. A very key point that Tokuda made is that networks with an API give your widgets "seven times the distribution."  Widgetadvpanel
That’s Facebook now, of course, "but more are coming soon." He said that RockYou is "the largest CPI widget ad network."  What’s CPI, you ask?  Cost per install. "Widget distribution is hard," said the RockYou CEO. "Only 1% succeed."  But, he wanted to make sure we all understood that "third-party ad networks enable better distribution" — specifically, he said their experience is 30 to 100 times better with ad support.

Doubleclick’s VP of rich media, Ari Paparo, says his firm is "enabling widget advertising." They’re helping advertisers take campaigns viral by putting elements like an "Ad to Google" or "Share" button in their ads. "We offer 100 different custom metrics per widget — the advertisers are demanding these."

Doubleclickwhy
Peanut Labs CEO, Murtaza Hussain, said his firm "helps widget companies monetize through market research."  With a Facebook app they designed, they allow people to earn money by taking surveys. They have 120 research clients, and an industry-leading 29% response rate.

Moderator Gur jumped back in to mention some other ways that people are looking at monetizing: "affiliate links, the iLike model, and using virtual currency." Then he popped  a good question to the panel: "How much are all widget companies now generating, in total, in the way of revenues?"  Are you ready for the answer to this one? "Maybe $1 million per month," said RockYou’s Tokuda, causing a collective yet silent gasp to go up from the crowd. "Those who try to get installs by themselves fail," he said. In the next breath, he said it works much better, of course, to get a firm like his to advertise for you, to get those installs.  The moderator pointed out that, when we talk monetization of widgets, the majority of revenues is very definitely now coming from advertising.  What were some ideas for future monetization, he asked?  Peanut Labs: "Premium models." Doubleclick: "It may sound boring, but commerce." RockYou: "Delivering games into social networks."

Next question: "Who are the first-mover types of advertisers in this space, and are they more brand focused or direct response?"  Doubleclickroadmap
Doubleclick’s Paparo jumped in: "Definitely brand advertisers," he said. "And we see the first-movers especially in the theatrical (movies) and auto categories."  Peanut Labs’ Hussain: "Any advertiser looking to understand the Gen Y demographic." He said his firm asks 16 demographic and psychographic questions of its survey respondents.

The moderator then asked: "What kinds of packages are you selling, with what metrics?" RockYou: "Most just want to know the clickthrough to their site — Dell, for example. We’re also seeing a preference for Facebook buys."  When asked what the going rate was for an install, Tokuda said anywhere from 50 cents to $1.00 is the CPI rate for RockYou. He said a blogger his company follows recently reported that RockYou is getting double what others are charging, which he obviously takes great pride in.

"Before a widget maker launches, what advice would you give him or her?" moderator Gur asked. Peanut Labs: "Do market research!" He also would advise looking at virtual currencies, "which are strong." Doublclick would recommend using just standard ad units. "Collecting demographic data is over-rated." RockYou said to get your page views maximized, and that the demographic of young girls is a great way to do that.  "How do you scale?" the moderator followed up.  "You’ll start with an ad network, then eventually go to a direct model," said Doubleclick. And what do you need to support ad sales?  "You’d need an ad server of your own. But you’re probably not going to go direct for a while.  I mean, if annual revenues in the whole widget industry is only $12 million right now, then it could only support 10 sales people!"  The moderator switched gears: "As your widget develops, what’s a good time to start advertising?" RockYou: "I’d say maybe one million impressions per day." At that point, he said, it could make you $1000 a day." Speaking of sales people, Peanut Labs said it’s stopped accepting more publishers because it doesn’t have the sales people to support them.

In the panel followup and audience Q&A session, moderator Saar Gur said he thinks the real business models for widgets are still three to five years out. Doubleclick’s Paparo offered up some more insight into the current advertising picture. "It’s no secret that banner ads on Facebook aren’t selling well right now," he said. "The successes of banner ads on social networks in general are fairly spotty."  But perhaps the most interesting comment he made was this last one:  "Ads can’t be widgets — they’re different things. That’s how a lot of the brands I’m talking to are thinking."

Widget Summit, Day 1: How Do We Measure ‘Em?

Ian Kennedy, product manager for MyBlogLog at Yahoo, was a great moderator for this panel on how to do audience measurement of widgets. The writeup of this session tantalized us with talk of new “engagement metrics” — though little new was revealed, despite the moderator’s atempts to drag something out of the panelists. Widgetmeasurement1
We did learn, however, from Jeff Gillis, that Google will drop us a piece of news on us Tuesday via his analytics blog — he said 12 pm, and that would appear to mean noon, since nothing’s there yet.

Hooman Radfar, founder of Clearspring, kicked things off with a commercial about his widget platform and distribution service. He said more than 75 brands are now using it, and “thousands of developers.”  He also said his is the only company that provides real-time metrics. Clearspring’s original engine was built with RockYou, said Radfar, “which is the largest widget provider in the world.”  He said a new metric Clearspring has is “placement,” so you can track the sites where your widget is appearing. Looking forward, Radfar said his firm will be at Launchpad in November to introduce its new “open platform.”

Introduced next was Eyal Magen, founder of Gigya, who said his widget distribution network is used by 7 of the top 10 widget sites, and that it’s only a “30-minute integration.” He said what’s new from his firm are “Widget Usage Reports.” Widgetmeasurementpanel

Google Analytics’ Jeff Gillis followed with his hint-hint, wink-wink, that he’d have news on his blog on Tuesday. (He couldn’t have dropped the news on us on Monday? The team must be working all night….) He said we could sign up for the beta with a secret code, only for attendees. (Yeah right — ask me if you want it.)

Moderator Kennedy popped the big question at this point, “What do each of you have for measuring interactions within a widget?” Stunned silence. Gillis rambled about how Urchin Tracker measures “15 dimensions.”  But what about interaction within the widget, Kennedy repeated, “like tracking which specific buttons users are clicking on.”  No, Gillis said, they’re not able to do that.  Clearspring’s Radfar saw an entry here to say “we have ‘interaction analytics’ coming out.” No word of when. He said they “won’t be dependent on Flash.” He also admitted there are other things as well that aren’t being measured yet, including “viral spread and most popular,” among others.

Are there any best practices yet, asked Kennedy, regarding placement of a widget on a site?  After all, “there’s a whole science of where best placement is in other media” — certainly for print, to name one. Google’s Gillis said it’s too early, but eye-travel studies (the so-called heat map) show an “F” pattern, which would suggest left-side placement as best. Gigya’s Magen said something to suggest that top placement might be good. Clearspring’s Radfar commented to just “keep it simple….people have a tendency to cram a whole web site in a widget.”  He also stressed a key point: that advertisers expect different metrics than publishers. Gillis said it’s “user-specific metrics” that many want.

“Where will we be in a year?” asked moderator Kennedy. “Will we have a definition of ‘engagement metrics’?” Google’s Gillis: “The term can mean many different things to different web sites.” Radfar: “A big issue will be how are you going to collect data in a non-intrusive way?”  Moderator Ian Kennedy closed the panel with a take of his own: “People will want to measure direct revenue and indirect revenue.”  Ah, the elusive monetization.  More on that later.

UPDATE (10/16, 10:30 am Pacific):  This just in, as promised — the latest Google Analytics news.  Now I know why they held it till today….there’s an eMetrics event in Washington, DC, where they’re making this multi-part announcement.

 

« Older posts Newer posts »