Graeme Thickins on Tech

Reflections & analysis about innovation, technology, startups, investing, healthcare, and more .... with a focus on Minnesota, Land of 10,000 Lakes. Blogging continuously since 2005.

Page 12 of 142

Raising Money You Don’t Need: MN Startup Trend?

I Dont Want Your Money[UPDATE 9/28/15: At the bottom of this post, I include some great comments I got from a leading VC over the weekend.]

This thing about profitable startups raising money they don’t need is getting deafening around here. A few years ago, Code42 shocked us by taking their first VC money (a huge $52M round), which confused people because they knew they were doing fine without it. [UPDATE: days after I wrote this post, it announced an $85M Series B.] Then LeadPages raises a surprise A round in late 2013 that it soon was openly bragging it hadn’t touched — didn’t need it. Only months later, it takes yet more — another $27M. It’s growing crazy fast, so we wonder… do they not need that either?  How about SportNgin, raising something close to $40M over four rounds going back to 2011? With the continuous growth they’re experiencing, why do they need all that cash and can they even spend it?

Now we learn about another rapidly growing Minnesota startup, Field Nation, which began as a young college grad’s idea more than a decade ago and now claims a $100M gross revenue run-rate, grabbing a huge (for this town, FieldNation-logo-horizanyway) Series A round of $30M. Reading the recent news in the StarTribune and the MSP Business Journal, you had to be impressed. Another homegrown startup raises a huge initial round. Wow, yes, we say to ourselves, beaming with pride, the Minnesota startup community really is rockin’! But what’s going on here with this latest winner in the local VC stakes?  Continue reading

The State — or Lack of a State — of Marketing Analytics

©VentureBeat-MktgAnalytics

Image @VentureBeat

How does one assess the landscape for an exploding technology category like marketing analytics? There’s so much confusion and hype around the topic. You’ve heard it all — too much data, we’re drowning in it, woe is us. And, along with that, too many vendors trying to sell us the latest cure. First we were shocked to hear the number of vendors was 1000, now we’re told it’s 2000! The argument that all these vendors create too many data silos is now a refrain we’re hearing more often. Hard to argue with that.

With such high numbers of players comes confusion, and complexity.

But it begs the question: how in the world do you unify all your marketing data to understand it and gain a competitive edge for your organization? Will a platform or single vendor solution emerge? Some of the big players like Oracle, Adobe, and Salesforce are certainly trying, opting in a big way for buy vs. build. (These three have led a frenzy of acquisitions in the marketing technology space.)

Yet significant roadblocks still exist to widespread adoption of marketing analytics in business today — and for companies to extract real value from it. The lack of data science skills we’ve all heard about by now till we’re blue in the face — it’s the “sexiest job title in the country,” blah blah blah. Big shortages, universities scrambling to launch graduate programs, etc, etc. But should  this technology really require a PhD in every marketing department and agency in the land? That simply doesn’t compute! Why can’t there be more solutions, more tools, that marketers and general business folks — regular Joes and Janes — can use? Why does it all have to be so complex?  Continue reading

There’s Something You Need to Know About Startup Marketing

Here’s a bulletin: it’s damn hard!

Okay, that may not be news to you if you’ve done at least one startup. But what’s not well known is that many HardWork-450winexperienced founders — and investors, too — think it bears little resemblance to traditional brand marketing, and that it can be done with, um, little or no money.

I’m not kidding – they really do. Another guy who’s noticed that is David Murdico, who recently wrote a post lamenting some cold, hard facts:  5 Reasons Startups Should Pay Marketing Agencies More Than Brands Do

(David heads an agency in LA, which has become a hot startup community — a very large one! Here’s his bio.)

“The myth out there is that startups don’t have very high budgets because they’re – you know – startups, so they shouldn’t pay marketing agencies, ad agencies, the gardener, the people at the counter at Burger King, or other professionals at the same rates that those nasty big brands do.

They should pay more.”

Yes, you read that right — that’s what David said. Because startup marketing is in fact harder than traditional brand marketing, he maintains. In his post, he goes on to make an excellent argument about why… which, as someone who’s focused virtually my entire career in this space, I think really nails it.

“Working with a startup team takes every bit as much time, creativity, effort, critical thinking, planning, strategizing, communication and resources as working with the marketing team at a big brand, and probably more.”

David gives five reasons why the above is true:
1. Nobody knows who you are yet.
2. You are every bit as demanding as a brand marketing team.
3. You are very stuck on your own ideas and greatness.
4. You often hire an agency to shut up and do as they’re told.
5. You keep changing your mind about stuff.

You can read more on those points in his post. Now, granted, saying all that is pretty easy — but what can reasonably be done to do something about this problem? And it is a real problem — one that’s holding back too many startups. But let me try, with my own list of 5 things:

1. Founders need to get real about marketing, plan better, and budget more money for it. They can and should seek help in this regard. Good advice is available out there from many disinterested parties who can provide objective feedback or recommendations. Obviously, every startup needs advisors, and you’d be taking a big chance if you don’t have a marketing person on your advisory team! And I say that even if you already have a marketing cofounder — because an advisor can provide a valuable sounding board. The critical, overriding marketing question for your startup is this: what will it really take, dollar-wise, to achieve the level of traction or market penetration that your plan calls for?

2. VCs and angel investors need to better understand marketing. They’re largely finance people. Most VCs don’t even have startup operational experience (yes, angels are more likely to), let alone marketing. In my thirty years of working with startups, I’ve run across precious few investors who are really marketing savvy (unless you count those who actually believe in  the viral-marketing fairy). Sure, some VCs may have taken a marketing class or two for their MBA, and they talk about customer acquisition a lot, and but most don’t really understand all the things needed to make that happen — nor the investment it requires. The lucky startup that just “takes off” via word-of-mouth is rare indeed. (Granted, some of the top-tier VC firms actually employ smart marketing people as part of their portfolio company support team — which is one reason they’ve achieved top-tier status. But these are very few indeed.)

3. Founding teams (and any and all people involved in startups) need to adjust their expectations. There are many misconceptions about startup marketing, and a good advisor can help in this regard. For example, founders have to stop thinking that, if they could just get media coverage in TechCrunch or VentureBeat or some other such media site, all their marketing problems would be solved. “We just need a ‘kick-start’ and we’ll get all the signups we need!” Dream on. I can have you talk to some founders for a reality check.

4. Watch out with that term “agency” — meaning most startups actually don’t need an entire firm (and the overhead that goes with it). Let’s use the term here to just mean a small creative team, often simply two people: a writer and a designer. Those are the key operatives. But they of course need to be experienced startup marketing strategists at the same time, with an understanding of media — or the latter can be an additional team member. What working with an “agency” really means for a startup is the smallest possible team, who can wring the most value possible out of a modest budget. But, because they have startup chops, they should be paid well. Yes, even more than their counterparts on a traditional “brand” agency team, because this is different, more specialized, and harder work that run-of-the-mill work for established brands.

5. As a founder, think very carefully about how much you allocate for marketing in your proposed “Use of Funds” — that is, the percentage of the total dollar amount you plan to raise (or do raise). Investors need a critical eye here, too. Especially watch out for a line-item that says “Sales and Marketing” — that doesn’t cut it! First of all, sales is a subset of marketing in any successful business. It’s the here-and-now, the day-to-day, the “who am I going to sell next?” It’s not marketing, which is about planning and strategy for a longer term than… um, a few days, a week, or a quarter! Sales is heavily oriented toward people expenses (salary, commission, travel, etc) — marketing not so much. Rather, it’s more about media, advertising, research, PR, customer acquisition, even some product development activities. Costs attributed to “Sales,” especially for a startup that must build a salesforce or a channel, can quickly escalate and overshadow dollars that really need to be invested in Marketing. Word to the wise: don’t put the cart before the horse. Good marketing — planning, strategy, brand building — must get attention ahead of investments in Sales. The right Marketing will drive the right Sales.

Yes, startup marketing is hard. Get help, think big, and don’t cheap out.

Retailers Are Lagging, Says Omnichannel Leader

[Note: This post first appeared on April 30th at Minnov8.com, where I’m a regular contributor.]

SPScommerce-Influence-logoRetailers still don’t appear to be facing the profound changes their industry is undergoing, according to Peter Zaballos, VP of marketing and product at Minneapolis-based SPS Commerce, in a keynote he gave yesterday at the company’s annual “omnichannel” conference, called In:fluence15.

“It’s not just about ‘the Amazon effect’,” he said. “It’s about digital engagement.”

Continue reading

SaaS is so yesterday. The new hotness? Software WITH a Service: #SwaS

So, we know you’ve been sitting around wondering… what’s the next big wave in B2B software? Well, so have a bunch of Silicon Valley VCs, according to the author of a recent TechCrunch guest post, “Why ‘Do It For Me’ Is The Next Big Thing.”

Service-keyboard-450wThe author is Anthony P. Lee, a general partner at Altos Ventures, and he makes an excellent argument about how SaaS is no longer enough — specifically, for companies in the ginormous space we call Small Business.

Continue reading

« Older posts Newer posts »