Reflections & analysis about innovation, technology, startups, investing, healthcare, and more .... with a focus on Minnesota, Land of 10,000 Lakes. Blogging continuously since 2005.

Tag: venture capital (Page 4 of 14)

Chris Shipley Speaks: The Real Scoop on Why the DEMO Producer Is Moving On

The DEMO conferences have a long, rich history, serving for some 19 years as "The Launchpad for Emerging Technology."  It's a brand like no other in the conference business.  And I can say that as someone who's been reporting on a wide range of technology conferences for more than a decade.  DEMO isn't so much a meeting or event as it is a spirit, a dedication, a community of people who celebrate new ideas and product innovations, and the thrill of building those into companies. (There's a lot more on the DEMO web site, and here's their About page.)

As closely as I follow all things DEMO (and I attend both their flagship U.S. events, spring and fall, every year), I was as shocked as anyone when a press release jumped out at me as I scanned my email inbox around midnight on February 18, saying DEMO was forging a long-term partnership with VentureBeat, and, after 13 years as executive producer, Chris Shipley was passing the torch to VentureBeat's Matt Marshall.

ChrisShipley-DEMOprphoto375w

The next day, I emailed Chris and asked if she'd consent to be interviewed.  I thought the week before DEMO '09 would be a good time (in the lull as we press and bloggers anxiously await the well-guarded list of who will be presenting at the event) to delve into the background behind this startling news announcement, and get Chris' own words on why and how it came about. She was kind enough to agree. I especially wanted to cover this story because a mini-firestorm had erupted in the blogosphere of conjecture and commentary on this news, and I felt a real need to clear the air. So, she and I conducted the following email exchange over the past couple of days. (Just as background, Chris is CEO and founder of her own analyst firm, Guidewire Group, and has been throughout her entire stint as DEMO's executive producer.)

DEMO-08-closingshot375w Tech~Surf~Blog:  Chris, how hard a decision was this to make?  Have you been considering it for some time?  What made this the right time? 

Chris Shipley:  Neither I nor Guidewire Group took this step lightly.  DEMO has been a big part of my career and a key client to Guidewire Group for a long time, and it's difficult to make a big change like this.  At the same time, I've been able to accomplish many of the goals I've set for DEMO, and while there is still a long and rich future ahead of the DEMO brand, Guidewire Group poses new and bigger challenges, challenges that I find very exciting.  Is there ever a "right time" to make a big change?  I'm not sure, but I do know that Guidewire Group's focus — working with young companies as they face significant points of transition — couldn't be more needed than now.   As we put our full attention on our clients, I believe we'll have plenty of opportunity to help companies through this tough economy.

Tech~Surf~Blog:  What did you think of a certain Silicon Valley tech blog that shall remain nameless running a story saying that "DEMO is in trouble"?  And what's been your take on the media interest in general that's resulted in your decision to pass the baton?  

Chris Shipley:  Honestly, I don't think much about it at all.  DEMO isn't in trouble; it's a strong brand that continues to deliver value to its customers.

Your question implies that last summer's market noise drove my decision to step down from DEMO, which is not at all the case.  I'm not leaving DEMO so much as I am going to a new and exciting opportunity.   

You know, there's a lot of "Inside Baseball" in the blogosphere and in Silicon Valley. I've really never been a big participant in those conversations because I don't find them particularly relevant to what I'm trying to do: work with young companies to help them deliver great products to customers who value the relationship with that company.  The vast majority of those customers don't care who launched what gossip about whom.  They care about solving real problems effectively and cost-efficiently.  So, it seems a much better use of my time to listen to the broader market rather than the echo chamber that the Valley can too often be.

Tech~Surf~Blog:  How long have you known your designated successor, Matt Marshall of VentureBeat?  How influential were you in his selection as your successor?  DEMO has stated it plans to delve into "deeper topics."  Will the fact that Matt has a Ph. D. in government mean the event will try to appeal more to policy wonks and academics?  Or what does that portend for the brand, really?

Chris Shipley:  I met Matt as he was founding VentureBeat in 2006, and immediately recognized him as a smart, ethical guy passionate about entrepreneurs and the venture ecosystem.  When I finally made the decision to step down, IDG asked me to help identify my successor and I immediately thought of Matt.  I approached him in the fall and worked closely with both VentureBeat and IDG to make the deal happen.

By "deeper topics," I think Matt's saying that the combination of the live event (DEMO) and the online media property (Venture Beat) creates the opportunity to continue a conversation across the two forums.  The DEMO events cover only about six days a year.  Now, with VentureBeat, DEMO can be a 365-days-a-year community, and that, fundamentally, will allow the conversation to dive deeper into themes and trends.

You know, I don't see Matt as a policy wonk or academician so much as I view him as a thoughtful, hard-working journalist.  I think he'll bring that energy and integrity to the DEMO event, infuse it with his own style and interests, and ultimately make the event his own.  That's what I hope for him, for DEMO, and for the DEMO community.

Tech~Surf~Blog:  How much time will Matt devote to DEMO versus running his own company (which isn't even three years old yet)?  How much time did you personally devote to DEMO versus running your own longstanding firm, Guidewire Group?

Chris Shipley:  Ultimately, that's a question for Matt, so I'll leave it to him to answer.  DEMO is, however, a big job and it is time consuming.  Like every other entrepreneur, I had to get smart about how I spend the limited resource that is my time.  I think I was able to do that reasonably well.  Ultimately, though, I determined that the exciting and energizing work ahead for Guidewire Group is work I want to be dedicated to full time.  And that's what drove the decision to step down from DEMO.

Tech~Surf~Blog: As DEMO's executive producer, it's no secret you travel a lot, worldwide, to meet one-on-one with startups.  Did this demanding travel schedule have anything to do with your decision?  Or did other aspects of doing the same thing for 13 years enter in?

Chris Shipley:  I love the travel because I love meeting entrepreneurs in their business environments, no matter if it's an office in Mountain View or one in Taipei or Madrid or Adelaide.  It's critical, I think, to understanding local market constraints and opportunities.  And it puts Silicon Valley in appropriate perspective.  Guidewire Group has international reach and international clients.  It is, in no small part, what differentiates us from other analyst firms.  So, I don't think the travel demands are going to change very much, and I'm not sure that I'd want them to.

The subtext of the question, really, is "what drove you from DEMO?"  It seems people want the "real story" behind my departure.  The true and remarkably non-salacious answer is "nothing."  DEMO is a great property.  It is a tremendous platform.  And it has been an honor to oversee this event and work with so many passionate entrepreneurs over the last 13 years.  DEMO never got boring, and I am not tired of DEMO, or run down by the travel, or discouraged by competitive or even economic pressure.

I'm not leaving DEMO so much as I am going to a great new challenge: building Guidewire Group into a world-class analyst and advisory firm, focused on early-stage companies that, at times of transition and critical decision, need a fresh perspective to help form and validate their strategies and positions.  Working intensely to help startups succeed.  What could be more fun than that?

Tech~Surf~Blog:  What's your take on the health of the technology startup mindset?  Has it changed with the recession, now increasingly a worldwide one?  Have you observed differences, now or over the years, between U.S. entrepreneurs and those in other countries?  Is there a reason more non-U.S. startups seem to be increasingly pitching at DEMO conferences?

Chris Shipley:  Are you testing my ability to parse a multi-part question? 😉 This is, without question, the deepest recession in the technology market I've experienced in the 25 years I've been covering the industry.  It is affecting every company, not just one over-inflated sector, and it is global in scale.  Without question, the recession will cull the flock. Companies that lack the resources, leadership, and vision to manage through this crisis will go away.  And those that are just a little bit smarter, a little bit faster, a little bit more courageous will win the day.  That's true whether they are in Silicon Valley, the United States, or in any other part of the world.

I used to see a pretty big capabilities gap between U.S. and non-U.S. technology entrepreneurs.  That gap has closed pretty dramatically.  While there are still many cultural and business structural differences that separate U.S. and foreign entrepreneurs, I think I could argue successfully that the barriers that non-U.S. entrepreneurs face are exactly the conquests that make them smarter, more adaptable, and ultimately more successful companies.  Think of it: it's relatively (and I stress "relatively") easy to create a business in an environment that offers all the support and infrastructure an entrepreneur could need. It's a whole lot harder to do that same work without the support systems. So a company that is successful without the support is, arguably, going to be very successful when given the full comfort and care of a nurturing environment like Silicon Valley, even if it is also more competitive.

We consciously went looking for non-U.S. companies to bring to DEMO for exactly that reason.  This is a global market.  Competition can come from anywhere.  Great new ideas aren't bound to Silicon Valley. I've tried to reflect that in the DEMO lineup.

Tech~Surf~Blog:  Please tell us about Guidewire Group.  How many employees do you have?  Who are your clients?  What is your mission?  And what if anything will change about Guidewire Group now that you've stated it will become 100% of your focus, once you transition fully from your role at DEMO after the fall 2009 event?

Chris Shipley:  Guidewire Group is a global analyst firm that works with early-stage companies to effectively build and execute their business strategies. We've identified opportunity in working with young companies at key transition points, to develop and deliver business strategy, monetization plans, and market validation.  Through custom projects, retained analyst services, events such as Innovate!Europe, and Guidewire Studio, our exclusive in-residence program, we're doing the work we love most — helping startups thrive.

We work with a range of clients, both startups and large companies that want to build their relationships with early-stage companies.

We are a small team today, although I suspect that will change a bit over the next year.  We have so many ideas that we want to pursue, and with full focus, time, and passion, I know we'll be able to bring the best of those ideas to life for the benefit of our clients and community.

Tech~Surf~Blog:  Many thanks for taking the time, Chris.  Best of luck in the next, exciting chapter of your career.  And I'll see you at DEMO '09 in Palm Desert.  I'm so looking forward to that opening reception Sunday night…

Chris Shipley:  Thanks, Graeme. I really do appreciate your support. See you in a couple of days.

Photo credits: 1) DEMO PR photo, 2) my own photo as I left DEMO '08, January 30, 2008.

[If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or
subscribing to have future articles delivered to your feed
reader or email inbox.]

Hints of What’s Coming at DEMO ’09

As noted to the right in my sidebar, I'll be reporting from the DEMO conference coming up soon in Southern California. I always look forward to this time of year. I think it will be my seventh or eighth DEMO event in a row (they're held twice a year), and maybe my tenth overall. DEMO is "The Launchpad for Emerging Technology."  DEMO-09-logo+dates
Nowhere else can you get a reading on what's coming in tech better than you can at this event. Click in that graphic to the right for details about registering.

DEMO prides itself in finding the "diamonds in the rough" before anyone else. Over the years, this event has been the site of the first launch of such ventures as Palm, Java, TiVo, and E*TRADE in the mid/late '90s, and, in more recent years, Salesforce.com, VMware, Six Apart, OddPost, IronPort, GrandCentral, and Glam Media, to name a few. 
DEMO says it focuses "on real products ready for market—regardless of their geography." Presenting firms hail from many countries.

DEMO-TheMomenContinues

So, who attends this thing?  Media and bloggers, VCs, business development professionals, IT executives, and new technology firms from all over the world.  DEMO says 15,000 people have attended their events over the past
19 years. Read more here: Who Attends DEMO? Here's a sampling of companies the people of DEMO have told me will be attending the upcoming event on March 1-3: Deutsche Telekom AG, August Capital, Meakem Becker Venture Capital, First Round Capital, Allegis Capital, Motorola, Google, Hitachi America, Microsoft, Qualcomm, Symantec, UBS, NYSE, Wall Street Journal, The Economist, VentureBeat, Business Week, Forbes, ABC, eWeek, North Bridge Ventures, NTTCOMWARE, Hummer Winblad Venture Partners, Verizon, Alcatel-Lucent, SVB Capital, Mayfield Fund, Granite Ventures, New Enterprise Associates, and more.

What kinds of firms will be pitching?  Well, DEMO doesn't let out much in advance of the show — certainly not the list of presenters. That's a big secret. (Companies actually have been dropped from the event if they leak that they're presenting. And we press attendees, of course, have to honor that embargo as well.) The list of presenters is only released the Friday night before the event, which kicks off with a Sunday night reception. (I always post that list of presenters as soon as it's released to the press, so watch this space on the evening of February 27th.)  But the DEMO producers did provide me with an interesting set of stats on the DEMO '09 presenters, represented in a couple of charts. So, here's a Breakdown of DEMO '09 Presenters by Market Segment and Funding to Date:

DEMO-09-stats But should we really be expecting much excitement at DEMO this year?  Isn't the economy in the tank?  Does innovation really move ahead in these times?  You bet it does!  And the DEMO blog cites recent examples of that from the 2001 downturn. Sure, there will be fewer attendees, and fewer presenters. For the last several shows, we've seen about 65 presenters on average doing their six-minute pitches at each event. This time, it will undoubtedly be less, maybe may even fewer than 50. But I guarantee you we'll be hearing some of tomorrow's big winners, on stage for the first time. Because we always do. And the anticipation of that is, frankly, really exciting to me, and to the rest of 500+ who will be attending. It is an extremely upbeat affair, every single time.

There are some great updates being posted on The DEMO Blog, by Chris Shipley, Executive Producer, and other staff members.  Here are three recent posts:

• Two Panels Just Announced for DEMO '09 … VCs on one, past DEMO company CEOs on the other
• Smart Money Takes a Flight to Quality … "yes, it's a great time to throw a conference that launches new technology products, spots trends, and celebrates innovation"
• Making a Lasting Impact … about how one past DEMO presenter, battery company Boston Power, is growing rapidly

And give a quick listen to a podcast about DEMO '09 recorded on January 29 by my friend Keith Shaw of Network World and Carla Thompson of the Guidewire Group.

Your intrepid reporter: pumped and ready. I can't wait to live-tweet DEMO '09! I did somewhere between 200 and 300 newsy tweets at the last one — so (fair warning) get ready for the firehose!  And I'll be doing podcast interviews for the first time, too, with my whiz-bang new toy: a studio-quality handheld recorder. I'm gonna give it a go in the way of some short, ad-hoc interviews of presenting company founders, VCs, and various luminaries wandering the great hall, the pavilion, and (of course) the hallways. And I'm told I can upload these pretty quickly to my blog, giving those of you who can't be there at least a near-realtime sense of what's going on at DEMO.

Will you be going to DEMO '09?  If so, let us know in the comments! (And let's try to meet up face-to-face.)  If you can't make it, what would you most like to see covered? What answers would you be seeking if you were there? What you would most want to get out of the event?

Angels and VCs Working More Closely? Signs of Hope…

In the technology startup world, angels and VCs have at best been seen as different camps, with separate perspectives, and even being at odds with each other many times. One is from Venus, the other’s from Mars. One tends to be a cocky MBA, the other’s an entrepreneur with real operational experience. Armwrestling_2

One pounds spreadsheets all day, the other’s a cowboy. As a minimum, they certainly don’t have a record of working closely together. They can compete for deal flow, they often distrust each another, and it’s frequently heard that angel investments can foul up the chance for later VC rounds because of unrealistic valuations or poor cap structure, or whatever.

There was a time when "venture capital" was synonymous with seed-stage investing. But, with the trend in recent years toward larger and larger funds, some approaching $1 billion, "You don’t have to do much math to realize that such firms are forced to make bigger and bigger investments to generate adequate returns for their limited partners," says Sramana Mitra in her recent column in Forbes: The Real VCs of Silicon Valley. (Mitra is an experienced technology entrepreneur and strategy consultant in Silicon Valley.) An excerpt from the column:

"…if you are an entrepreneur, especially a first-time entrepreneur,
you need to look for the ‘real’ VCs who are willing to take risks and
invest their time in mentoring you, not those big names that the term
venture capital normally conjures."

And who does Mitra say those real VCs are?

"So-called ‘angels.’ While VCs primarily invest other people’s money,
angels invest their own. An entrepreneur working on a fledgling idea
needs investors who not only provide valuable business advice but also
connect the dots to make business development partnerships happen, help
recruit key team members and help move the venture from concept to a
fundable company. Angels tend to have the operational background
necessary to play such a role."

Angels investing is no small phenomenon. One study found that that angels invested $25.6 billion in
2006 in the U.S. in 251,000 mostly early-stage deals (for an average investment of
about $100,000).

In her piece, Mitra seriously questions whether and how the gap created by VCs moving to larger and larger investments is being filled. Her closing line: "In capitalism, gaps generally get spotted and filled. This one–and the entrepreneurs in it–is still waiting."

Clarion Call
Mitra’s point comes early in her column: "we need to create a sort of microequity program for start-ups." It’s getting to be a common refrain; angels are clearly being expected to pick up more of the slack, as VCs leave early-stage investing behind and entrepreneurs get increasingly frustrated. Yet positive things are starting to happen, with more and more sophisticated, managed angel groups forming (or becoming more formalized), all across the country.

Note: this is not just a Silicon Valley phenomenon. That may be the epicenter of the VC industry, and where most of their money is invested, but not so for angel investors. Their is no epicenter. Sure, there are some notable angel groups in the Valley. But the distribution of these groups is much more even across the country. If anything, the Midwest rules. The Angel Capital Association is located in, are you ready? …Kansas. Of the organization’s approximately 150 member groups (see their directory), it’s the Midwest region that has the largest number of such groups (40), by a wide margin. So, yes, it’s fair to say that angel investing is more a heartland thing.

Reactions from Both Sides
Seeing the column in Forbes inspired me to do another blog post on angel investing. (See this category of my blog for lots more I’ve written on the topic; I also did a recent post on the new blog Minnov8.) After reading the Forbes piece, I reached out to three of my contacts whom I thought would have something to say in reaction.  First, from the angel side:

"I really think that linking the angel and VC markets really hurts both models," said Pete Birkeland, CFO of angel network management firm RAIN Source Capital, St. Paul. "The VCs get hammered for not investing early enough, and the angels get hammered for scattershot investing. These are two complementary but distinct activities. They’re both needed to continue to grow companies and innovate. As we run our angel groups, we want to be able to look at opportunities that are early and risky, and invest in those that have a potential for a return.  That return may be 3-5x, and we may be able to live on a seven-year horizon —  that (scenario) wouldn’t even get past a first screen by a VC. We need an ‘angel manifesto’ that breaks us away from VCs, and the mindset that we have to all become VCs.  However, with the view of limited partners and the dollars involved, it’s tough to escape the gravitational pull of the VC model."

And from an individual angel: "Founders, especially those without prior startup experience, need strong advisors, even operational advisors," said Doug Henrich, a former Microsoft executive and angel investor now living in the Twin Cities. "For an angel to be successful, I feel he or she needs to be active in the startup. The money of course is needed, but the experience and counsel are more valuable in successful startups. The experience has to come from somewhere…I wonder how large VCs can make money in the software space these days."  I read that last comment of Henrich’s to mean that, for software startups, angel investors are naturally a better fit — that such firms need the type of mentoring that comes from angels in their early stages. In other words, VCs’ big money isn’t the answer; it doesn’t tend to produce the desired result.

One Big Sign of Hope
From the VC side, I very much wanted to get a comment from a firm I know well — one that started in Minneapolis, still has close ties here, but has been headquartered in Palo Alto for several years: Crescendo Ventures. Davidspreng
David Spreng is the Managing General Partner of the firm, and has been on the board of the NVCA (National Venture Capital Association) since 2005. He recently launched a great blog called "Lightbulb," and here’s his About page there. But the most interesting thing is that David was recently tapped by the NVCA board to be the organization’s liaison to the angel community. That, to me, is very cool — a sure sign the two sides will be coming closer together in the future.

David was jumping on a plane when he I caught him, but pointed me to a recent blog post of his titled Angels and VCs Find Common Ground. In it, he reprints an article he co-wrote a couple of months ago with a board member of the Angel Capital Association. I had heard wind of this article before, and told him I bet I could get some good insights of his from it. I was right. I encourage you to read the full article, but here’s an excerpt:

While both angel groups and VCs have issues to improve in our relationships and processes, establishing strong relationships with quality angel groups can be extremely valuable to a venture firm’s deal flow and ultimate returns.

At $250,000 to $1 million, the average size round for an angel group is often below what most venture capitalists would consider investing in a Series A round. However, respected angel groups may well have the next generation of promising early stage companies that a venture capitalist is not ready to invest in but also doesn’t want to lose track of.

The ACA and the NVCA are both committed to working together to improve the relationships between angel groups and venture capitalists by sharing best practices and enhancing communications between the two associations.

Transitions from angel groups to venture capitalists should be seamless and considered a valued relationship for all the stakeholders, including entrepreneurs, co-investors and limited partners.

As I said, signs of hope. And it can all only be good for you entrepreneurs out there.

UPDATE (4/11/08): Well, maybe not as much hope as I thought. Just saw Sramana Mitra’s new column this morning in Forbes:  Fund Envy: Venture funds are getting bigger all the time. This is bad news for aspiring entrepreneurs. Yes, she says, taking a poke at the name of a well-known VC’s blog, "Greed, indeed, is infectious."

 

Some of the Great People I Met at DEMO ’08

Time for my traditional waltz through the business card stack from the DEMO conference last week in Palm Desert. Besides, I need something to do on the plane home. I always meet so many interesting people at these events, and this one was certainly no exception.  The mood is so upbeat at DEMO, the energy level so high!  I mean, 77 companies launching, and probably a half a dozen people in attendance from each firm on average (counting a PR rep and many times an investor or board member or two) — all higher than a kite, ready to tell anyone who’ll listen about their red-hot new company! Demostagebanner
On top of that, a press contingent of about 80 is wandering about, not to speak of a whole slew of VCs, angels, and corporate investors and biz dev people. I collect a lot of business cards from these folks, even though I’m quite busy most of the time, attending every session — nose to the Macbook and/or iPhone blogging or Twittering.

Before I get to the new folks I met, here are some of the folks I ran into again whom I already knew or had met previously (alphabetically by last name):
– Stewart Alsop, VC, Alsop-Louie Partners (and the original founder of DEMO)
– Renee Blodgett, Blodgett Communications (for SpeakLike and Toktumi)
– Gary Bolles, now CEO of new startup Xigi.biz
– Katie Boehret, Technology Reporter, Wall Street Journal
– Kevin Dorren. now Chairman, HubDub
– Dan Farber, VP Editorial, ZDnet
– Mike Garity, VP, Network World Conferences
– Dan Gillmor, Journalist, Author, Angel Investor (one is Seesmic)
– Paula Gould, PEG PR (for Delver)
– Shel Israel, Blogger/Author, now FastCompany’s Global Neighbourhood TV guy
– Steve Larsen, CEO, Krugle
– Erica Lee, StrategicLee (for DEMO)
– Walt Mossberg, Technology Reporter, Wall Street Journal
– Rafe Needleman, Editor, CNet, and Chief Blogger, Webware.com
– Keith Shaw, Editor, Network World
– Chris Shipley, Executive Producer, DEMO
– Becky Sniffen, MC2 Communications (for DEMO)
– Brian Solis, Founder, Future-Works PR
– Don Thorson, now VP Marketing, Ribbit

Demopatio

The pix on this page are just a couple random shots. Here’s my complete DEMO ’08 Flickr set.

And now for the new people I met — at least those I got a business card from (again alphabetically by last name):
– Liad Agmon, CEO, Delver
– Michael Bogart, The Bogart Group (who does the production of DEMO)
– Bill Bryant, Board Advisor for both Blist and Liquid Planner
– Terra Carmichael, SutherlandGold Group PR
– Jinnan Cai, Cofounder/VP-Prod Dev, Buska (Perth, Australia)
– Gerry Caulfield, Lead Technology Engineer, Buska (Perth, Australia)
– Kirk Chen, Cofounder/Product Architect, iLeonardo
– Matt Clark, AE, Lotus PR (for Catalyst Web)
– Sanford Cohen, CEO, SpeakLike
– Mike Dever, CEO, YouChoose.net
– Nigel Eccles, Chief News Junkie, HubDub (Edinburgh, Scotland)
– Quentin Hardy, Silicon Valley Bureau Manager, Forbes
– Patrick Harr, CEO, Nirvanix
– Linda Huang, VP Marketing & Sales, Santrum
– Ryo Koyama, CEO, Yoics
– Miiko Mentz, Future-Works PR (for HubDub)
– Melinda Meggyesy, Online Community Manager, LiquidPlanner
– Dave Merkel, VP Products, Mandiant
– Yannis Papakonstantinou, Cofounder, App2You.com
– Stephanie Rice, Sr AE, Ruder Finn West
– Michelle Schafer, Acct Supervisor, Merritt Group PR (for Mandiant)
– Robert Schettino, Marketing, iVideoSongs.com
– Dan Seyer, VP Product Management, Ribbit
– Carnet Williams, CEO, SproutBuilder.com

Once again, it was great meeting all of you!  I thought it was a particularly good DEMO, and I was excited about the quality of the startups presenting.  I hope to hear again from you folks I met at the event. Stay in touch!  For more, see this index page of my coverage of DEMO 08 on this blog, and even more on Twitter, plus my DEMO 08 photo set on Flickr.

The Year in VC: Forbes Reports It Well

As I look forward to DEMO, starting tomorrow evening — a VC lovefest like no other — I really enjoyed reading Forbes.com today.  I continue to be impressed by their coverage of tech.  It surely has something to do not only with their great reporters and editors (especially in the Silicon Valley bureau), but with their very well respected tech-savvy publisher, Rich Karlgaard, whom I count among my most admired colleagues.Forbeslogo

And the fact that he hails originally from the part of the country where I live also makes him very special, too!  Though he’s a Stanford boy and has lived in the Valley for many years, he gets back to the Minnesota/Wisconsin/Dakotas area regularly, and I suspect that’s partly because it keeps him feeling grounded to his roots.

Forbes uncorked an awesome set of stories the past couple of days on the current state of VC — well, really tech deal-making in general.  It’s all tied to their annual Midas 100 List, which ranks the top tech deal makers in the world. Forbesmidaslist08It’s fascinating reading.

According to Forbes, companies that venture capitalists helped launch hauled in $34 billion from 86 public offerings and 304 acquisitions during 2007. No less than 31 IPOs happened in the fourth quarter, worth $3 billion — "more than any other quarter since the third quarter of 2000."  That’s a very telling stat.  Their assessment of who did what, and how much they and their investors profited, can be viewed here by rank, by name, or by company.

Some of the related stories to this coverage included the following, which is great reading for anyone involved in technology startups:

• Big Wins For Venture Capitalists – An excerpt: "Recent credit crunch and market woes be damned: Technology’s most powerful deal makers have been on a winning streak."

• Venture Firms Peek Out Of Silicon Valley – I love this part: "More and more firms are thinking that if they want differentiated deal flow, they need to look outside of Silicon Valley," said Village Ventures co-founder Matt Harris. Village Ventures manages $750 million in funds focused on 14 small cities across the country, from Boise, Idaho, to Tucson, Arizona. This article also includes a profile of a VC from my part of the country: John Neis, co-founder of Madison, WI-based Venture Investors, who’s one of the Midas 100.

• The Golden Google Touch – "Google has been a bonanza for venture capitalists John Doerr and Michael Moritz, who helped fund the Google when it was a start-up. Their personal gains, according to Forbes’ estimates, are likely north of $800 million apiece."

• Hot Or Not: Where VCs Will–And Won’t–Invest – "Forbes asked 10 top players to give us their assessments of areas they feel are hot–and which are not."

All in all, a great overview of the current situation, and you’ll see even more links of interest, too.  They even have some informative videos posted that are part of this coverage, such as interviews with certain  players they cover in these articles.  I’m really impressed with the expanded coverage Forbes.com is providing on their site, and the quality of that coverage.

[I’m excited that Tech-Surf-Blog will be part of the Forbes Financial & Business Blog Network when it launches soon. (Yes, that’s part of the reason I’m starting to include ads on this site.) ]

What do you think of the current state of tech deal-making?  Are you positive or negative about 2008 when it comes to VC funding, IPOs, or M&A?

« Older posts Newer posts »